Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eri Shimizu vs Maddison Inglis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shimizu vs Inglis analysis and find out who is favored!
Eri Shimizu vs Maddison Inglis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shimizu has won 50.75% of points on his second serve, while Inglis has won 46.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shimizu, in recent form, has won 54.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Inglis has won 55.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.64% and 41.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shimizu has saved 65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Inglis has saved 57.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shimizu has won 58.49% of matches played (W/L 31/ 22), with Inglis winning 60.66% (W/L 37/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shimizu has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 11/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Shimizu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.49% of matches (W/L 31/ 22), where as Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 34/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shimizu has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.74 while Inglis has played against players with an average rank of 299.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shimizu has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Inglis has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shimizu has converted 45.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Inglis has converted 47.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shimizu 0 - 0 Inglis
448
Rank
394
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
226
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
61% (147-95)
Career Total W/L
59% (249-173)
66% (21-11)
YTD W/L
69% (18-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$423,460
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eri Shimizu | Maddison Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (21/11) | 69% (18/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (48/27) | 66% (41/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (396/313) | 57% (328/251) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (18/10) | 63% (10/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 95 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 113 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:41 | 1:49:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 289.19 | 313.85 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1449/2099) | 61% (1090/1794) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (922/1449) | 67% (732/1090) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (334/650) | 46% (327/704) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (114/241) | 47% (118/251) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (900/2069) | 47% (906/1934) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 66% (21/11) | 73% (16/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (21/32) | 69% (18/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (23/20) | 88% (17/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (23/3) | 12% (17/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 33% (9/3) |
Eri Shimizu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Eri Shimizu
Player
Misaki Matsuda
67%
(
73 of
109)
1st Serve %
75%
(
76 of
102)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
50 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Eri Shimizu
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
3
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Rin Nakagawara
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Eri Shimizu
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Rebecca Marino
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
0
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Kyoka Okamura
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Saki Imamura
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Naho Sato
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Eri Shimizu
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
0
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(13) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
21%
(
5 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
52%
(
33 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Maddison Inglis
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
13
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
31%
(
17 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
61 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Stacey Fung
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Ena Shibahara
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Yexin Ma
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kimberly Birrell
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Arina Rodionova
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
115)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kyoka Okamura
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Maddison Inglis
56%
(
80 of
144)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
33 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
44%
(
64 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Shimizu Vs Inglis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Eri Shimizu
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Maddison Inglis
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
